Cannabis oil cures man's cancer after he was given 18 months

Cannabis oil cures man's cancer after he was given 18 months




A 33-year-old father from the U.K. is completely cancer-free, but not because of chemotherapy or radiation. David Hibbitt's doctors diagnosed him with a "terminal" case of bowel cancer that they said would kill him within 18 months, but he successfully eliminated this cancer on his own by taking therapeutic doses of cannabis oil at a cost of about $75 per month.

Initially opting for chemotherapy http://www.dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=30976, radiation and surgery -- and watching this all fail -- Hibbitt decided to take control of his own health by researching his condition online. When he came upon information outlining cannabis oil as a viable treatment alternative, he decided to give it a go with amazing results.

According to the Daily Mail Online, Hibbitt went the cannabis route as a last-ditch effort when all else failed, and it turned out to be the best decision he could have made. As of January, medical scans show that Hibbitt is completely cancer-free, all thanks to the concentrated cannabis oil that he took from small vials provided by a local dealer.

"Friends had told me about cannabis oil and I dismissed it at first," Hibbitt explains. "I've never been into drugs. But in February last year I was told I only had 18 months to live, and I felt I had to try everything I could. I felt like chemo was killing me and I had nothing to lose. I couldn't accept I was going to die."

'Phoenix Tears' grade cannabis oil saved David Hibbitt's life by curing his cancer

Understandably hesitant due to the stigma that still surrounds this powerful healing plant, including its unjustified illegality in many areas, Hibbitt thought long and hard about his options before concluding that cannabis was worth a go, especially in light of the health damage he'd already undergone as a result of invasive chemotherapyhttp://dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=32958.

He contacted a local manufacturer of high-potency cannabis oil, a therapeutic grade of which is commonly referred to as "Phoenix Tears," and was able to procure the amount he would need for treatment. The result, he says, is evident in his now-clean bill of health.

"It gets you pretty high and knocks you for six, but it's nowhere near as bad as chemotherapy," he told the media. "The pain just seemed to disappear and it seems to have done the job. I just want to make other people aware that there are other options out there."

Establishment threatened by natural cancer medicines like cannabis oil that cost a fraction of what conventional treatments run

One would think that Hibbitt's amazing recovery from advanced-stage bowel cancer using natural cannabis oil would be the subject of international headlines, with health officials everywhere scrambling to end prohibition in order to allow people to grow and use their own healing medicines for minimal cost compared to chemotherapy and radiation. But this is far from what's actually happening.

Like with most other natural cancer treatments, nearly all of which are outlawed in the U.S., cannabis oil is still regarded as "unproven" or even "dangerous" by the establishment, which would rather that cancer patients undergo poisoning than consume a healing plant with literally dozens of healing compounds found nowhere else in nature.

"We know that cannabinoids -- the active chemicals found in cannabis -- can have a range of different effects on cancer cells grown in the lab and animal tumors," admits Dr. Kat Arney from Cancer Research U.K., at the same time citing the excuse that there "isn't good evidence from clinical trials" to prove that these compounds actually help cancer patients.

But the proof is in the patients who've successfully used the medicine and experienced miraculous healing from it.

To learn more about Phoenix Tears cannabis oil and how it's curing people of supposedly terminal illnesses like cancer, check out Rick Simpon's information page:http://phoenixtears.ca/

Also, be sure to check out the amazing GcMAF treatment for cancer that's been linked to the seven some-odd holistic doctors who mysteriously died (and who some allege may have been murdered or "suicided" for their discovery) in recent weeks: http://www.dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=32925

Find what medical disorders can be treated with marijuana at http://www.truthwiki.org/hypothyroidism/

Find other breaking and unfiltered stories on the risks of chemotherapy treatments at http://www.chemotherapy.news/

Sources for this article include:

http://humansarefree.com/2015/07/this-man-was-given-18-months-to-live.html

http://phoenixtears.ca/

http://www.dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=32925

Read more

5 Reasons Phthalates Should Be Banned Immediately

5 Reasons Phthalates Should Be Banned Immediately

Not that long ago, I talked about 12 ways toxins are sneaking into your life http://dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=31911, and while all toxins are bad news, there’s one group that should be banned immediately. I’m talking about phthalates; these are a class of chemicals used to make plastic flexible. 



For that reason, they’re also commonly referred to as plasticizers. Because they affect reproductive system development http://www.dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=32639, the US government made the smart decision to keep them out of children’s products, banning six of them. This seems like a good thing, right? Well, it’s a start. The problem is there are a lot more than six types, and there’s nothing stopping manufacturers from using unbanned ones. That ban also only deals with kids’ products, so where does that leave the rest of us? Well, if you’re still wondering why phthalates are so bad, here are five reasons they should be banned this instant.

1. Phthalates Have Infiltrated Children’s Food

I mentioned my “12 Toxins” post earlier, and this topic came up there, but I want to talk a little more about it. There’s a fairly mysterious thing happening right now: phthalates are getting into some infant diets and at very high levels. Now logically, you’d think if phthalates are taken out of kids’ products—and, for the most part, they are, since the ban covers the six most commonly used ones—there’d be no room for exposure. But, that’s not the case. The contamination is believed to happen somewhere in food processing, or—since phthalates bind to fat molecules—the chemicals might even be in the animal feed and move on from there. Basically, the food is exposed to phthalates before it gets to the table.


2. Phthalates Make Plastic Medical Devices Unsafe

While phthalates might be well regulated in toys, that’s not the case when it comes to medical supplies. These plasticizers are still used heavily in plastic medical devices — the same devices used to keep preemies alive! Most hospitals and clinics don’t regulate how these chemicals are used, so the most vulnerable of infants could be struggling to breathe on a ventilator with plastic tubing. That breathing tube likely contains phthalates that can make their way into the infant’s system. A recent study even found that, over time, preemies are exposed to toxic levels that can affect not only reproductive development but also liver function http://dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=32521. [1]

3. Phthalates are Destroying Our Ecosystems

Here’s another problem — phthalates are contaminating our waterways. Plastic litters our oceans and traditional water bottles are a large culprit. Given that, it makes sense that phthalates will make it into the water supply as those items decompose. Two things can happen: marine life can eat the plastic directly, or just be exposed to phthalates in the water. While it’s still unknown what this toxic marine life means for us, if phthalates are getting into infant diets somehow, could this be a culprit?

4. Phthalates Destroy Hormone Balance

It’s thought that phthalates can disrupt levels of hormones like estrogen and testosterone http://bit.ly/testosterone-support. I already mentioned that phthalates can affect reproductive health, but there is also a risk for cancer. Don’t think you’re unaffected, either, do you wear makeup or use a moisturizer? Phthalates are often used to help dissolve ingredients. Do you use hairspray? Manufacturers use plasticizers to keep your hair from becoming too stiff. Studies have even found that your exposure to toxic phthalates is higher based on what personal care products you use. [2] [3]

5. Phthalates are Linked to Asthma

Even more worrying is the possible link to childhood asthma. From 1998 to 2006, scientists studied the phthalate levels in over 300 pregnant women. Research found that the children of the women with higher phthalate levels were 72 to 78 percent more likely to have a diagnosis of asthma http://www.dreddyclinic.com/findinformation/aa/asthma.phpthan those of the women with low levels; that number is over three times the national average! [4]

So, are you convinced that phthalates should be banned immediately? Maybe there’s something you know about phthalates that’s not listed here. By all means, leave a comment below and tell us what you think of these nasty toxins.

-Dr. Edward F. Group III, DC, ND, DACBN, DCBCN, DABFM

References:

1. Mallow, E.B. & Fox, M.A. Phthalates and critically ill neonates: device-related exposures and non-endocrine toxic risks https://noharm-global.org/sites/default/files/documents-files/2991/Phthalates%20and%20Neonates%20-%20Mallow%20%20Fox%20-%20%20J%20%20Perinatology%20Dec%20%202014.pdf. Journal of Perinatology 34, 892-897.

2. Braun, J., Just, A, Williams, P, Smith, K., Calafat, A. & Hauser R. Personal care product use and urinary phthalate metabolite and paraben concentrations during pregnancy among women from a fertility clinic http://www.nature.com/articles/jes201369.epdf?referrer_access_token=IwX44LYZVSbpVczYXOvhgdRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0P9jQ-p7mDj7PSM-5DhiEIx6PPO1DDmApE88KGEmXsaMhnO2VoQJi3cKeVBjG-Ie6J8Go7fmDConNw4f5Fdqdu1. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 24, 459-466.

3. Dodson, R. E., Nishioka, M., Standley, L. J., Perovich, L. J., Brody, J. G., & Rudel, R. A. Endocrine Disruptors and Asthma-Associated Chemicals in Consumer Productshttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404651/. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(7), 935–943.

4. Whyatt, R. et al. Asthma in Inner-City Children at 5–11 Years of Age and Prenatal Exposure to Phthalates: The Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health Cohorthttp://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/122/10/ehp.1307670.alt.pdf. Environmental Health Perspectives, DOI:10.1289/ehp.1307670.

Read more

What is NutraCool®?

What is NutraCool®?

NutraCool®
nutracool, relief cream, topical cream
All Natural Lotion for Muscle & Joint Relief

• NutraCool®
• $29.95
• [Learn More]
• BUY NOW
• NutraCool® is Dr. Group's topical cream for muscle discomfort, sprains, and strains. This formula contains the finest, strongest, organic, natural ingredients available.

NutraCool® is a topical cream for muscle discomfort, sprains, and strains. This formula contains the finest, strongest, organic, natural ingredients available.

- Description: 
- Ingredients: http://www.dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=34655
- Instructions: http://www.dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=34658
- Research: http://www.dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=34659

Soothe Your Sore Muscles and Joints Today With NutraCool®!

What you'll discover on this page:

- What is NutraCool®?
- A brief history of the invention of NutraCool®
- What are the top 5 reasons you need NutraCool®?
- What are the health benefits of NutraCool®?
- What do customers like about NutraCool®?
- NutraCool® is risk-free to try
- Why is NutraCool® the best product for stiffness and soreness?

What is NutraCool®?

NutraCool® is a uniquely formulated blend of 13 natural, hand-selected herbs and ingredients designed to provide maximum relief from sore muscles, sprains, and strains. This topical cream is safe, non-greasy, and contains no chemicals, artificial ingredients, fillers, or toxic substances. Millions of people around the world live in constant discomfort, don't be one of them!

A Brief History of the Invention of Nutracool®

Nutracool® is the result of unparalleled ancient wisdom reinterpreted with modern equipment, production and analysis.

The history of Nutracool® is based on unique absorption and energetic processes that Dr. Group invented during his research into discomfort, swelling, soreness and redness associated with damaged or traumatized tissue. He discovered that all injuries heal slowly when the body is contaminated with toxic residue that suppress its own internal self-healing mechanism. Toxins come from many sources, including air, food, water, beverages, harmful organisms, stress, and radiation.

After experimenting with patients who had been in car accidents, had sports injuries, swelling, or tissue damage arising from poor health conditions, Dr. Group embarked on a journey to create the most powerful herbal lotion on the market.

Using a natural combination of herbs and homeopathic substances that been popular in ancient Ayurveda http://bit.ly/Ayurveda-Medicine, American and Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dr. Group created a formula that would stimulate the body's natural healing mechanism.

Based on Dr. Group's research, Global Healing Center has created a revolutionary, multi-step, proprietary processing technique that combines ancient and current technologies. Across the world, NutraCool® is recommended by doctors as a natural, non-toxic solution to the irritation, swelling, redness and soreness associated with acute or chronic injury.

What are the Top 5 Reasons You Need NutraCool®?

- The active ingredients work together to soothe sore muscles.
- Great for controlling discomfort between massages or chiropractor visits.
- Contains menthol to provide cooling relief, no narcotics or harmful ingredients.
- Safe to use every day.

May help with:
- Stiff joints
- Sore back
- Muscle strains
- Sprains
- Sore feet
- Cramps
- Neck aches
- Knee tenderness
- Hip discomfort

What are the Health Benefits of NutraCool®?

- Penetrates deep to target discomfort and muscle tension.
- Supports normal range of motion.
- Safe and effective for children, the elderly, and all skin types.
- Lightweight, non-greasy, non-oily, won't stain.
- Bonus! Physicians get a $6.00 reimbursement per application of NutraCool.

We Asked Our Customers What They Like Best About NutraCool®

"Fantastic! This is an amazing product. I have tried every single similar product in the market, prescription strength and over the counter. I always go back to nutracool, it is THAT good!" ~ Sofia

"Amazing! This has always worked great for me. I've never felt any side effects whatsoever and the product did exactly what it's meant to." ~ Bathory0003

"Works great! Used to use a cream from a big box store, it worked okay but was greasy and smelled like my grandmother. Nutracool isn't greasy and won't make you smell funny. Can't go wrong with this one!" ~ NB

NutraCool® is Risk-Free For You To Try

We are sure you will see and feel the muscle soothing results of NutraCool®. 
If you aren’t absolutely satisfied, you’re protected by our...
100% No-Risk 180-Day Money Back Guarantee
If you are not satisfied with your results, just let us know and we’ll send you a prompt refund. No questions asked.


Why is NutraCool® the Best Product for Stiffness and Soreness?

- Only NutraCool® contains a chemical-free blend of soothing herbs and a natural lotion base.
- Doctor developed and recommended!
- Small batches are made fresh under extreme care.
- Does not smell like medicine or a 19th century liniment!
- GMO free, never tested on animals, and it's made in the USA!


Get Started Today and Discover How NutraCool® Can Soothe Your
Sore Muscles... Or Your Money Back!!

NutraCool®
All Natural Lotion for Muscle & Joint Relief

• NutraCool®
• $29.95
• [Learn More]
• BUY NOW
• NutraCool® is Dr. Group's topical cream for muscle discomfort, sprains, and strains. This formula contains the finest, strongest, organic, natural ingredients available.

Customers who bought this item also bought:

Aquaspirit® http://bit.ly/Aquaspirit

Aquaspirit® 
30 Review(s)
Refreshing Body & Facial Mist with Organic Ingredients

Parfait Visage® http://bit.ly/ParfaitVisage

Parfait Visage® 
48 Review(s)
All Natural Luxury Face Cream

O2-Zap® http://bit.ly/OzonatedOliveOil

O2-Zap® 
Ozonated Olive Oil May Help with Eczema, Acne, Wrinkles and More!
77 Review(s) | Add Review
O2-Zap® is organic, extra virgin olive oil that’s loaded with pure oxygen and ozone. Perfect for soothing swollen or irritated skin or tissue.

Read more

Medical doctors speak out about why they avoid naked body scanners at airports

Medical doctors speak out about why they avoid naked body scanners at airports




For those still contemplating whether or not the radiation emitted from airport naked body scanners is serious enough to avoid, you may be interested to know that many doctors routinely "opt out" and choose the full-body pat down instead because they recognize the inherent dangers associated with any level of radiation exposure. A recent CNN piece explains that for many doctors, avoiding all sources of radiation whenever possible is just the smart thing to do.

Throughout the past year, was covered many stories related to the US Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) controversial naked body scanners, which are now installed and in use at nearly 80 US airports (http://www.tsa.gov/approach/tech/ait/faqs.shtm). Besides representing an unconstitutional invasion of privacy (http://www.tsa.gov/approach/tech/ait/faqs.shtm), the scanners blast passengers with full-body doses of health-destroying radiation (http://www.dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=22309).

So what do medical doctors who fly have to say about the machines? Well, according to CNN's Elizabeth Cohen who recently conducted her own small investigation, many are concerned about the radiation these scanners emit. In fact, Cohen quotes several doctors who express concern about the cumulative effects of repeated radiation exposure, even if such exposure is supposedly miniscule and below established thresholds for causing harm.

"I do whatever I can to avoid the scanner. This is a total body scan -- not a dental or chest X-ray," said Dr. Len Lichtenfield to Cohen in an email. "Total body radiation is not something I find very comforting based on my medical knowledge."

Another doctor explained that there is "no absolutely safe dose of radiation," and that "each exposure is additive." So even if the supposedly low radiation doses emitted from the naked body scanners are as low as TSA and the machines' manufacturers claim they are, habitual exposure will still cause bodily harm.

Even Dr. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society (ACS) expressed concern about whether the safety of them machines, and whether or not TSA is properly maintaining and testing them for safety. After all, TSA refused to release safety reports for quite some time, and when they did, the bungled reports explained nothing more than TSA's high level of incompetence (http://www.dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=117&t=25045).

Back in December, radiation scientists admitted that naked body scanners are fully capable of causing both sperm mutations and cancer, despite insistence by authorities to the contrary (http://www.dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=22309). Other reports suggest that nobody really knows how much radiation is actually emitted from naked body scanners due to flawed and inconclusive safety tests (http://www.dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=115&t=22322&p=35076)

Sources for this story include:

http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/03/31/ep.airport.scanners/index.html

Read more

New Report Ranks U.S. Poorly for Maternal Health

New Report Ranks U.S. Poorly for Maternal Health

According to a new report conducted by the State of the World Mother’s, the United States ranks 33 out of 179 countries surveyed for maternal health. [1] Just last year, the U.S. was at 31. How can a country so developed be drastically behind other countries in taking care of mothers and their newborns? Could it be the medical establishment in the country that is driving the maternal health crisis, or something far more hidden and obscure?



Maternal Health Even Worse in United States

One out of 1,800 women each year dies during or following childbirth, representing the worst maternal death rate of any developed nation. The U.S. also ranked 42 out of 179 for children’s wellbeing, and 89 out of 179 for political status. Washington, D.C., seems to have the highest rate of infant mortality at about 7.9 deaths per 1,000 live births. To put this into a comparable perspective, cities like Oslo and Stockholm rank below 2.0 deaths per 1,000.

Could a Simple Nutritional Factor Be the Culprit?

The requirement for iodine increases over 50% for pregnant mothers http://www.dreddyclinic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=33834, but many still fail to receive enough through food. [2] Even physicians may overlook this crucial nutrient need. We know, based upon current meta analyses, that iodine deficiency increases infant mortality. [3] Research also shows that low iodine intake during pregnancy may also harm a baby’s IQ. [4] These findings suggest that, if we increase our awareness around iodine in medicine and the media, we may perhaps see a drop in infant mortality and increase in maternal health.

Were you aware of the state of maternal health in America? What do you think, other than iodine supplementation, could help improve it? Please let us know your thoughts in the comments!

by Dr. Edward Group DC, NP, DACBN, DCBCN, DABFM

References:

1. Eliana Dockterman. U.S. Ranks Worst Developed Country for Maternal Health http://time.com/3847755/mothers-children-health-save-the-children-report/. TIME.

2. Zimmermann MB. The effects of iodine deficiency in pregnancy and infancy http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22742605. Paediatr Pernat Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;26 Suppl 1:108-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01275.x.

3. Paolo Vitti, MD. Iodine deficiency disorders http://www.uptodate.com/contents/iodine-deficiency-disorders. UpToDate.

4. Sarah C. Bath, PhD, Colin D Steer, MSc, Prof Jean Golding, FMedSci, Pauline Emmett, PhD, Prof Margaret P Rayman, DPhil. Effect of inadequate iodine status in UK pregnant women on cognitive outcomes in their children: results from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(13)60436-5/fulltext. The Lancet. Volume 382, No. 9889, p331-337, 27 July 2013.

Read more